GTFS to OSM route matching: mdb-198

Cedar Rapids Transit — US_Iowa_Waterloo
385 trips, 0 matched (0.0%).

bus 5 (7441): 0 of 85 trips matched (no OSM route of this type in the grid cell: 85)

bus 1 (7437): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
63	GTC Bay 1	GTC Bay 1	30	1 (16626759)	1.00	0.67	0.45	0.00	0.00	0.27	–	map

bus 10 (7446): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
30	GTC Bay 10	GTC Bay 10	30	34 (12361657)	0.00	0.67	0.91	–	0.00	0.30	–	map

bus 12 (7448): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
57	GTC Bay 12	GTC Bay 12	30	34 (12361657)	0.00	0.79	0.85	–	0.00	0.26	–	map

bus 2 (7438): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
55	GTC Bay 2	GTC Bay 2	30	2 (12352772)	1.00	0.67	0.38	0.00	0.00	0.27	–	map

bus 6 (7442): 0 of 30 trips matched (no OSM route of this type in the grid cell: 30)

bus 7 (7443): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
50	GTC Bay 7	GTC Bay 7	30	34 (12361657)	0.00	0.90	0.68	–	0.00	0.27	–	map

bus 8 (7445): 0 of 30 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
57	GTC Bay 8	GTC Bay 8	30	34 (12361657)	0.00	0.79	0.85	–	0.00	0.27	–	map

bus 11 (7447): 0 of 23 trips matched

Stops	From	To	Trips	OSM candidate	ref	count	distance	direction	points	names	mean
52	GTC Bay 11	GTC Bay 11	23	34 (12361657)	0.00	0.86	0.66	–	0.00	0.25	–	map

bus 3 (7439): 0 of 23 trips matched (no OSM route of this type in the grid cell: 23)

bus 20 (7449): 0 of 22 trips matched (no OSM route of this type in the grid cell: 22)

bus 30 (7450): 0 of 22 trips matched (no OSM route of this type in the grid cell: 22)

ℹ️ How to read this

Every GTFS trip is matched against the OSM route relations of the same type whose bounding box covers the trip's area. A candidate must pass five gates — platform count, stop-to-stop length, direction, platform positions and platform names — and the best one is accepted when the mean of its scores exceeds 0.70. If no candidate carries the trip's own ref, the best other candidate needs a mean above 0.75 and a 0.05 lead over any other line. Trips of one stop pattern (the same stop sequence) are decided together, so each row below is one stop pattern, matched ones (green candidate cell) included so a route's matched and unmatched patterns can be compared; the candidate shown is the one that decided the result or, when nothing passed, the one that got furthest. The pink cell says why: a signal — the first gate the candidate failed; the ref — no relation of the trip's own line passed the gates (or none is a candidate at all, when the ref score is 0), so this is another line; the mean — the candidate passed every gate but the mean is not above the threshold, or, when a "lost its margin to" row follows, it leads that other line by less than 0.05. Hover a pink cell for the full wording. "map" opens the pattern over OpenStreetMap: GTFS stops in red, the candidate's platforms in green, the runner-up's in orange, and the platform–stop pairs the points signal assigned as dashed lines.