GTFS to OSM route matching: mdb-3202

El Paso Transportation Authority — US_Texas_West
143 trips, 0 matched (0.0%).

All feeds

bus Rte31 (12932): 0 of 40 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
15Mission Valley Transfer CenterMission Valley Transfer Center20 BRT-3 (14943155)0.000.470.280.000.000.15– map
23Mission Valley Transfer CenterMission Valley Transfer Center20 BRT-1 (10169287)0.000.590.580.000.000.23– map

bus Rte50 (12928): 0 of 24 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
43Mission Valley Transfer CenterMission Valley Transfer Center24 BRT-2 (14703016)0.000.700.570.000.000.22– map

bus Rte20 (12930): 0 of 23 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
37Upper Eastside Transfer CenterUpper Eastside Transfer Center17 BRT-1 (10169287)0.000.950.590.000.000.22– map
37Upper Eastside Transfer CenterUpper Eastside Transfer Center6 BRT-1 (10169287)0.000.950.590.000.000.22– map

bus Rte10 (12929): 0 of 21 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
48Westside Transfer CenterWestside Transfer Center21 15 (9775775)0.000.060.200.000.020.01– map

bus Rte30 (12931): 0 of 20 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
36Mission Valley Transfer CenterMission Valley Transfer Center20 BRT-1 (10169287)0.000.920.590.000.000.21– map

bus Rte40 (12933): 0 of 15 trips matched

StopsFromToTrips OSM candidaterefcountdistancedirection pointsnamesmean
41Mission Valley Transfer CenterMission Valley Transfer Center11 BRT-1 (10169286)0.001.000.380.000.000.21– map
25Mission Valley Transfer CenterTornillo & OT Smith2 BRT-1 (10169287)0.000.640.650.960.000.23– map
17Tornillo & OT SmithMission Valley Transfer Center2 BRT-1 (10169286)0.000.410.770.960.000.20– map
ℹ️ How to read this
Every GTFS trip is matched against the OSM route relations of the same type whose bounding box covers the trip's area. A candidate must pass five gates — platform count, stop-to-stop length, direction, platform positions and platform names — and the best one is accepted when the mean of its scores exceeds 0.70. If no candidate carries the trip's own ref, the best other candidate needs a mean above 0.75 and a 0.05 lead over any other line. Trips of one stop pattern (the same stop sequence) are decided together, so each row below is one stop pattern, matched ones (green candidate cell) included so a route's matched and unmatched patterns can be compared; the candidate shown is the one that decided the result or, when nothing passed, the one that got furthest. The pink cell says why: a signal — the first gate the candidate failed; the ref — no relation of the trip's own line passed the gates (or none is a candidate at all, when the ref score is 0), so this is another line; the mean — the candidate passed every gate but the mean is not above the threshold, or, when a "lost its margin to" row follows, it leads that other line by less than 0.05. Hover a pink cell for the full wording. "map" opens the pattern over OpenStreetMap: GTFS stops in red, the candidate's platforms in green, the runner-up's in orange, and the platform–stop pairs the points signal assigned as dashed lines.